Happiness measure, code: O-DT-u-sq-v-7-a


Selfreport on single question:

How do you feel about your life as a whole.....?
7 delighted
6 pleased
5 mostly satisfied
4 mixed
3 mostly dissatisfied
2 unhappy
1 terrible

Name: Andrews & Withey's `Delighted-Terrible Scale' (original version)
  
Classification
Focus, O-DT Overall: Delighted vs Terrible life
Time frame, u time unspecified
Mode, sq 1 question
Scale type, v verbal scale Range = 7
  
Used in studies
  
ReferenceAckerman et al. (1989): study US 1986
TitleFarm Work and Family: Major Sources of Satisfaction for Farm Families.
PublicDairy farm couples, Utah, USA,1986
  
ReferenceAndrews & Withey (1976): study US 1972 11a
TitleSocial Indicators of Well-Being. Americans Perceptions of Life Quality.
Public18+ aged, general public, USA, 1972/11
  
ReferenceAndrews & Withey (1976): study US 1972 11b
TitleSocial Indicators of Well-Being. Americans Perceptions of Life Quality.
Public18+ aged, general public, USA, 1972/11
  
ReferenceAndrews & Withey (1976): study US 1973 4
TitleSocial Indicators of Well-Being. Americans Perceptions of Life Quality.
Public18+ aged, general public, United States, 1973
  
ReferenceAndrews & Withey (1976): study US 1973 7
TitleSocial Indicators of Well-Being. Americans Perceptions of Life Quality.
Public18+ aged, general public, USA, 1973/7
  
ReferenceAndrews & Withey (1976): study US 1978 11
TitleSocial Indicators of Well-Being. Americans Perceptions of Life Quality.
Public18+ aged, general public, United States, 1978
  
ReferenceAndrews & Withey (1976): study US 1978 11
TitleSocial Indicators of Well-Being. Americans Perceptions of Life Quality.
Public18+ aged, general public, United States, 1978
  
ReferenceBalatsky & Diener (1993): study RU 1990
TitleSubjective Well-Being among Russian Students.
PublicStudents, Moscow and Glazov (Ural), Russia, 1990
  
ReferenceCummins (2007): study PL 1995
TitleAustralian Unity Wellbeing Index Survey 17 Part A; The Report. The Wellebing of Australians: Work, Wealth and Happiness
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1995
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 1991
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1991
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 1992
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1992
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 1993
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1993
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 1994
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1994
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 1996
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1996
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 1997
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1997
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 2005
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 2005
  
ReferenceCzapinski & Panek (2007): study PL 2007
TitleSocial Diagnosis 2007. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 2007
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1991 12
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public18+ aged, general public, Poland, 1991
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1992 12
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1992
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1993
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1993
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1994
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1994
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1995
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1995
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1996
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1996
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 1997
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 1997
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 2000
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 2000
  
ReferenceCzapinski (2003): study PL 2003
TitleIndividual Quality of Life.
Public16+ aged, general public, Poland, 2003
  
ReferenceForrester (1980): study US San Diego County, California 1980
TitleFactors Contributing to Life Satisfaction of Divorced Women.
Public21-71 aged divorced women, San Diego, California, USA, 1980
  
ReferenceHoopes & Lounsbury (1989): study US 1985
TitleAn Investigation of Life Satisfaction Following a Vacation: A Domain Specific Approach.
PublicWorking adults, USA, before and after vacation, 198?,
  
ReferenceKammann & Flett (1983): study NZ 1980 a
TitleSourcebook for Measuring Well-Being with Affectometer 2.
Public18 + aged, general public, New Zealand, 198?
  
ReferenceLinn et al. (1986): study US 1984 summer
TitleFactors Associated with Life Satisfaction among Practising Internists.
PublicPhysicians, California, USA, 1984
  
ReferenceMcCrae & Costa (1991): study US Baltimore County, Maryland 1979
TitleAdding 'Liebe und Arbeit': The Full Five Factor Model and Well-Being.
PublicSingle males and couples Baltimore USA, followed 7 years, 1979-86
  
ReferenceSimpson et al. (1989): study GB 1987
TitleThe Chronically Mentally Ill in Community Facilities. A Study of Quality of Life.
PublicChronic mental patients, Manchester, Great Britain, 1987
  
ReferenceSullivan et al. (1991): study US 1988
TitleQuality of Life of Seriously Mentally Ill Persons in Mississippi.
PublicFormer inpatients of mental hospital, Mississipi, 1988
  
ReferenceTiedje et al. (1990): study US 1985
TitleWomen with Multiple Roles: Role-Compatibility Perceptions, Satisfaction, and Mental Health.
PublicMarried women with a preschool child, USA, 1985
  
Reference~Australian Values Study (1984): study AU 1983
TitleAustralia and the Rest of the World: A Comparison.
Public18+ aged, general public, Australia, 1983